linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: mach-sa1100: Put nanoEngine support back in the kernel.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cecb6d8f1003090937t4ec3fe1cw293be3735caa2648@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 9 Mar 2010 14:37:09 -0300
From:	Marcelo Jimenez <mroberto@...i.cetuc.puc-rio.br>
To:	Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@...il.com>
Cc:	linux@....linux.org.uk, mad_soft@...ox.ru, rpjday@...shcourse.ca,
	jaswinderrajput@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: mach-sa1100: Put nanoEngine support back in the 
	kernel.

Hi Kristoffer,

On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 13:52, Kristoffer Ericson
<kristoffer.ericson@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Without testing it on the actual hardware it applies and looks good, compilation also goes smoothly without any issues.
> It looks quite alright to me. What are you planning to do with the fixup function?

Sorry, this function was the first things I wrote, but the kernel 2.6
infrastructure made it totally unnecessary and it should have been
removed. I will do it and send another patch.

> Im just missing the licensing text in the nano...c file for future reference,

Ok, I will add it too.

> after that feel free to add:
> Acked-by: Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@...il.com>
>
> Best wishes
> Kristoffer

Regards,
Marcelo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/