[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1268167499.2985.32.camel@iscandar.digidescorp.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:44:59 -0600
From: "Steven J. Magnani" <steve@...idescorp.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: tcp_recvmesg hang under NET_DMA
Hi,
I've run into a case where using NET_DMA seems to cause a PUT to a
modified ftpd to hang. AFAICT this is because the NET_DMA design queues
up lots of memcpy operations, but doesn't issue or wait for them (and
thus free the associated skbs) until it is time for tcp_recvmesg() to
return. In a case where userland requests a large read (as is the case
in my modified ftpd), packet transfer can grind to a halt because so
many packets are buffered up and there is no event that causes them to
be freed.
I can submit a patch that would issue pending memcpys and clean up
completed ones around tcp_recvmsg's call to sk_wait_data(), but first I
wanted to understand the design better. Were there specific reasons for
deferring the async operations so long?
Thanks,
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steven J. Magnani "I claim this network for MARS!
www.digidescorp.com Earthling, return my space modulator!"
#include <standard.disclaimer>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists