[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B95B5AC.8050101@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:42:52 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <htejun@...il.com>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@...hat.com>
CC: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Taylor <Daniel.Taylor@....com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>,
tytso@....edu, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, irtiger@...il.com,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, aschnell@...e.de,
knikanth@...e.de, jdelvare@...e.de, Jim Meyering <jim@...ering.net>
Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues.
Hello, again.
On 03/09/2010 11:34 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> - parted uses 1MiB alignment for disks with unknown topology, disks
>> with topology information are aligned to optimal (or minimum) I/O
>> size (parted >= 2.1)
>
> This will result in incorrect alignment for drives which lie about the
> physical sector size to work around BIOS/drivers issues (C-1). It
> would probably be best to align to at least 1MiB.
I misread it. C-1 would be disks w/o alignment information which will
be aligned to optimal_io_size which again would be 0 and thus 1MiB
alignment. So, this should work, right?
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists