linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] serial/sh_sci: Fix build failure for non-sh architectures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100310080841.GF19518@linux-sh.org>
Date:	Wed, 10 Mar 2010 17:08:41 +0900
From:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
To:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc:	Peter H?we <PeterHuewe@....de>, Magnus Damm <damm@...l.co.jp>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/sh_sci: Fix build failure for non-sh architectures

On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 09:00:24AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Paul Mundt wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:18:25PM +0100, Peter H?we wrote:
> > > From: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>
> > > 
> > > This patch fixes a build failure for various arm based defconfigs
> > > [1][2][3] and maybe other architectures/configs.
> > > 
> > > The build failure was introduced by the sh specific patch [4]
> > > "serial: sh-sci: Add DMA support"
> > > by Guennadi Liakhovetski
> > > 
> > > Patch against linux-next of 20100309
> > 
> > Please Cc linux-sh@...r.kernel.org so these things make it in to
> > patchwork in the future.
> 
> Ok, I understand, this breakage is only in linux-next, and only for 
> shmobile targets, which wasn't there as I was preparing the patch. 
> However, what I did oversee is the H8300 arch, which also uses the 
> sh-sci.c, and they are, probably, also broken in the mainline now. So, can 
> we, please, also schedule this for 34-rc2?
> 
Yes, it's in my .34 queue. H8300 doesn't actually matter though, since
they've never converted in-tree to using sh-sci through the driver model.
It likely hasn't been tested on H8 since 2.5, so I'm not exactly losing
sleep over it.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/