[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <983251.67335.qm@web7607.mail.in.yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:43:28 +0530 (IST)
From: Srinivas Nayak <sinu_nayak2001@...oo.co.in>
To: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: BUG: Is it a bug in Linux time() function or Linux OS calls?
Dear David,
I am not writing to network mounted disk. This is locally mounted and filesystem is ext3.
With best regards,
Yours sincerely,
Srinivas Nayak
My Home page: http://www.mathmeth.com/sn/
My Blog: http://srinivas-nayak.blogspot.com
--- On Wed, 10/3/10, David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com> wrote:
> From: David Newall <davidn@...idnewall.com>
> Subject: Re: BUG: Is it a bug in Linux time() function or Linux OS calls?
> To: "Srinivas Nayak" <sinu_nayak2001@...oo.co.in>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Date: Wednesday, 10 March, 2010, 2:17 PM
> Dear Srinivas Nayak,
>
> I don't suppose you're writing to a network mounted disk,
> with the network device's clock about half a second behind
> your test machine? Otherwise -- and I'm just guessing
> here, and will leave it to you to UTSL -- this could be
> explained by use of two different algorithms for converting
> a higher-resolution time source to the one-second
> resolution. A truncation algorithm versus a rounding
> algorithm could produce the result you demonstrate.
>
> Regards,
>
> David
>
The INTERNET now has a personality. YOURS! See your Yahoo! Homepage. http://in.yahoo.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists