lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:11:14 GMT
From:	tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	acme@...radead.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:perf/urgent] perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_update()

Commit-ID:  cc2ad4ba8792b9d4ff893ae3b845d2c5a6206fc9
Gitweb:     http://git.kernel.org/tip/cc2ad4ba8792b9d4ff893ae3b845d2c5a6206fc9
Author:     Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
AuthorDate: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 20:18:39 +0100
Committer:  Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:22:27 +0100

perf, x86: Remove superfluous arguments to x86_perf_event_update()

The second and third argument to x86_perf_event_update() are superfluous
since they are simple expressions of the first argument. Hence remove
them.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: paulus@...ba.org
Cc: eranian@...gle.com
Cc: robert.richter@....com
Cc: fweisbec@...il.com
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>
LKML-Reference: <20100304140100.089468871@...llo.nl>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c       |   11 ++++++-----
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c |   10 ++--------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index fcf1788..086127b 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -193,11 +193,12 @@ static u64 __read_mostly hw_cache_event_ids
  * Returns the delta events processed.
  */
 static u64
-x86_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event,
-			struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
+x86_perf_event_update(struct perf_event *event)
 {
+	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
 	int shift = 64 - x86_pmu.event_bits;
 	u64 prev_raw_count, new_raw_count;
+	int idx = hwc->idx;
 	s64 delta;
 
 	if (idx == X86_PMC_IDX_FIXED_BTS)
@@ -1064,7 +1065,7 @@ static void x86_pmu_stop(struct perf_event *event)
 	 * Drain the remaining delta count out of a event
 	 * that we are disabling:
 	 */
-	x86_perf_event_update(event, hwc, idx);
+	x86_perf_event_update(event);
 
 	cpuc->events[idx] = NULL;
 }
@@ -1112,7 +1113,7 @@ static int x86_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs)
 		event = cpuc->events[idx];
 		hwc = &event->hw;
 
-		val = x86_perf_event_update(event, hwc, idx);
+		val = x86_perf_event_update(event);
 		if (val & (1ULL << (x86_pmu.event_bits - 1)))
 			continue;
 
@@ -1458,7 +1459,7 @@ void __init init_hw_perf_events(void)
 
 static inline void x86_pmu_read(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	x86_perf_event_update(event, &event->hw, event->hw.idx);
+	x86_perf_event_update(event);
 }
 
 static const struct pmu pmu = {
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 6dbdf91..a4c9f16 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -694,14 +694,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int idx)
  */
 static int intel_pmu_save_and_restart(struct perf_event *event)
 {
-	struct hw_perf_event *hwc = &event->hw;
-	int idx = hwc->idx;
-	int ret;
-
-	x86_perf_event_update(event, hwc, idx);
-	ret = x86_perf_event_set_period(event);
-
-	return ret;
+	x86_perf_event_update(event);
+	return x86_perf_event_set_period(event);
 }
 
 static void intel_pmu_reset(void)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ