[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1786ab031003100938x19e7c054ieba6c34ebd939ad6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 09:38:35 -0800
From: Chad Talbott <ctalbott@...gle.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
Cc: Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Nauman Rafique <nauman@...gle.com>, jens.axboe@...cle.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 V3] io-controller: Add a new interface "weight_device"
for IO-Controller
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 7:30 AM, Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com> wrote:
> This still leaves the issue of reaching a gendisk object from request
> queue. Looking into it.
It looks like we have that pairing way back in blk_register_queue()
which takes a gendisk. Is there any reason we don't hold onto the
gendisk there? Eyeballing add_disk() and unlink_gendisk() seems to
confirm that gendisk lifetime spans request_queue.
Nauman and I were also wondering why blkio_group and blkio_policy_node
store a dev_t, rather than a direct pointer to gendisk. dev_t seems
more like a userspace<->kernel interface than an inside-the-kernel
interface.
Chad
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists