[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100310180750.GA3770@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:07:50 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wait_for_helper: SIGCHLD from user-space can lead to
use-after-free
On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 06:16:34PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> (this patch is orthogonal to other umh changes in -mm)
>
> 1. wait_for_helper() does allow_signal(SIGCHLD) to ensure the child can't
> autoreap itself.
>
> However, this means that a spurious SIGCHILD from user-space can
> set TIF_SIGPENDING and:
>
> - kernel_thread() or sys_wait4() can fail due to signal_pending()
>
> - worse, wait4() can fail before ____call_usermodehelper() execs
> or exits. In this case the caller may kfree(subprocess_info)
> while the child still uses this memory.
>
> Change the code to use SIG_DFL instead of magic "(void __user *)2"
> set by allow_signal(). This means that SIGCHLD won't be delivered,
> yet the child won't autoreap itsefl.
>
> The problem is minor, only root can send a signal to this kthread.
>
> 2. If sys_wait4(&ret) fails it doesn't populate "ret", in this case
> wait_for_helper() reports a random value from uninitialized var.
>
> With this patch sys_wait4() should never fail, but still it makes
> sense to initialize ret = -ECHILD so that the caller can notice
> the problem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists