| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <c1fb08351003101034h17957f4ele0a6cbec085fc434@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 20:34:12 +0200 From: Anca Emanuel <anca.emanuel@...il.com> To: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Cc: torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: Linux 2.6.24 Through Linux 2.6.33 Benchmarks Linux 2.6.24 Through Linux 2.6.33 Benchmarks http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2624_2633&num=1 quote: "This test system was using the EXT3 file-system and we found its TPC-B database performance to improve by many times between the Linux 2.6.29 and 2.6.30 kernel releases. In fact, the Linux 2.6.30 kernel was 770% faster than its predecessor was and it remained that way with the Linux 2.6.31 kernel and then regressed only slightly with the Linux 2.6.32 kernel. With the new Linux 2.6.33 kernel, however, the PostgreSQL performance atop the EXT3 file-system has fallen off a cliff. Not only has the PostgreSQL performance lost its gains made during the 2.6.30 development cycle, but also with Linux 2.6.33, it is actually much slower than it was in any of the pre-2.6.30 releases." http://www.phoronix.com/data/img/results/linux_2624_2633/2.png -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists