[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B981AC2.90201@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 16:18:42 -0600
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: gregkh@...e.de, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] usb-serial: optimize sysrq function calls
Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Mar 2010, Jason Wessel wrote:
>
>
>> There is no need to have external function calls for the sysrq
>> functions. The compiler can inline the sysrq calls such that they are
>> entirely a NOP if CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ is not set.
>>
>
> This is not the best way to do what you want. Keep
> usb_serial_handle_sysrq_char() and usb_serial_handle_break() as
> out-of-line routines in generic.c, but make them conditional on
> CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ. Then in the header file, depending on whether or
> not CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ is defined, either put the usual extern function
> declarations or else put do-nothing inline definitions.
>
> The advantage of keeping the functions out-of-line is the reduced
> amount of code space (since the bodies aren't replicated every place
> they get used). This way you keep that advantage while still getting
> the NOP implementation if CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ isn't set.
>
It is probably fine to just drop this patch entirely then.
I had originally made the change to keep it similar to the uart based
serial drivers where the definitions are inlined.
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists