[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B9824D5.8090906@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:01:41 -0800
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 6/6] sparc64: use early_res and nobootmem
On 03/10/2010 02:36 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 14:31:25 -0800
>
>> they are array based.
>>
>> 1. memmap is not changed after get it from firmware, <could be modified via mem= or memmap=>
>> 2. early_res at first is static array, later it will be relocated to another position if the array is not big enough.
>
> LMB could do this too with minor modifications.
>
> Simply make the lmb.memory and lmb.reserved be pointers, and initially
> they point into the static array(s).
>
> Later the pointers can be repositioned to point to dynamically
> allocated memory.
>
> So please, for the third time, please show me how LMB with some minor
> modifications is not able to satisfy your needs.
you could do it,
need to duplicate some functions from early_res.c and fw_memmap.c
esp __check_and_double_early_res, get_free_all_memory_range
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists