lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1268301520.6785.40.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date:	Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:58:40 +0100
From:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 8/12] sched: remove FAIR_SLEEPERS feature


sched: remove FAIR_SLEEPERS feature

Our preemption model relies too heavily on sleeper fairness to disable it
without dire consequences.  Remove the feature, and save a branch or two.

Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
LKML-Reference: <new-submission>

---
 kernel/sched_fair.c     |    2 +-
 kernel/sched_features.h |    7 -------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ place_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, stru
 		vruntime += sched_vslice(cfs_rq, se);
 
 	/* sleeps up to a single latency don't count. */
-	if (!initial && sched_feat(FAIR_SLEEPERS)) {
+	if (!initial) {
 		unsigned long thresh = sysctl_sched_latency;
 
 		/*
Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_features.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_features.h
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_features.h
@@ -1,11 +1,4 @@
 /*
- * Disregards a certain amount of sleep time (sched_latency_ns) and
- * considers the task to be running during that period. This gives it
- * a service deficit on wakeup, allowing it to run sooner.
- */
-SCHED_FEAT(FAIR_SLEEPERS, 1)
-
-/*
  * Only give sleepers 50% of their service deficit. This allows
  * them to run sooner, but does not allow tons of sleepers to
  * rip the spread apart.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ