[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <472A4C80-30CE-4875-8073-F7E61659B6F0@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 09:28:11 -0500
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@....EDU>
To: Nikanth Karthikesan <knikanth@...e.de>
Cc: Damian Lukowski <damian@....rwth-aachen.de>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Taylor <Daniel.Taylor@....com>,
Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, irtiger@...il.com,
aschnell@...e.de, jdelvare@...e.de
Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues.
On Mar 11, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote:
>
> I guess, what he meant was, to keep filesystem blocks aligned, even if the
> partition is not. Say if the partition is mis-aligned by 512-bytes, let the
> filesystem waste 4k-512bytes and keep it's blocks aligned. But it might be a
> case of over-engineering, possibly requiring disk format change.
Ah, yes, I agree with you; that's probably what he meant.
Sure, that's theoretically possible, but it would mean changing every single filesystem, and it would require a file system format change --- or at least a file system format extension.
It would seem to be way easier to simply fix the partitioning tools to do the right thing, though.
-- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists