| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:38:18 GMT
From: "tip-bot for Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:core/urgent] ftrace: Replace read_barrier_depends() with rcu_dereference_raw()
Commit-ID: 3f379b03fbfddd20536389a85c6456f8233d1f8d
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/3f379b03fbfddd20536389a85c6456f8233d1f8d
Author: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
AuthorDate: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 15:03:25 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:38:01 +0100
ftrace: Replace read_barrier_depends() with rcu_dereference_raw()
Replace the calls to read_barrier_depends() in
ftrace_list_func() with rcu_dereference_raw() to improve
readability. The reason that we use rcu_dereference_raw() here
is that removed entries are never freed, instead they are simply
leaked. This is one of a very few cases where use of
rcu_dereference_raw() is the long-term right answer. And I
don't yet know of any others. ;-)
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: laijs@...fujitsu.com
Cc: dipankar@...ibm.com
Cc: mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org
Cc: dvhltc@...ibm.com
Cc: niv@...ibm.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org
Cc: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com
LKML-Reference: <1267830207-9474-1-git-send-email-paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
kernel/trace/ftrace.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
index 8378357..8c5adc0 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ftrace.c
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
#include <linux/ctype.h>
#include <linux/list.h>
#include <linux/hash.h>
+#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
#include <trace/events/sched.h>
@@ -88,18 +89,22 @@ ftrace_func_t ftrace_pid_function __read_mostly = ftrace_stub;
static int ftrace_set_func(unsigned long *array, int *idx, char *buffer);
#endif
+/*
+ * Traverse the ftrace_list, invoking all entries. The reason that we
+ * can use rcu_dereference_raw() is that elements removed from this list
+ * are simply leaked, so there is no need to interact with a grace-period
+ * mechanism. The rcu_dereference_raw() calls are needed to handle
+ * concurrent insertions into the ftrace_list.
+ *
+ * Silly Alpha and silly pointer-speculation compiler optimizations!
+ */
static void ftrace_list_func(unsigned long ip, unsigned long parent_ip)
{
- struct ftrace_ops *op = ftrace_list;
-
- /* in case someone actually ports this to alpha! */
- read_barrier_depends();
+ struct ftrace_ops *op = rcu_dereference_raw(ftrace_list); /*see above*/
while (op != &ftrace_list_end) {
- /* silly alpha */
- read_barrier_depends();
op->func(ip, parent_ip);
- op = op->next;
+ op = rcu_dereference_raw(op->next); /*see above*/
};
}
@@ -154,8 +159,7 @@ static int __register_ftrace_function(struct ftrace_ops *ops)
* the ops->next pointer is valid before another CPU sees
* the ops pointer included into the ftrace_list.
*/
- smp_wmb();
- ftrace_list = ops;
+ rcu_assign_pointer(ftrace_list, ops);
if (ftrace_enabled) {
ftrace_func_t func;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists