[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B993847.3030100@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:36:55 -0500
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@...sta.com>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>, monstr@...str.eu,
gregkh@...e.de, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
sfr@...b.auug.org.au, ben-linux@...ff.org, dwmw2@...radead.org,
jeremy.kerr@...onical.com, James.Bottomley@...e.de,
broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 21/37] drivers/ata: use .dev.of_node instead of .node
in struct of_device
On 03/11/2010 01:31 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> .node is being removed
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
>> ---
>>
>> drivers/ata/pata_macio.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/ide/pmac.c | 10 +++++-----
>> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> Should probably have been 2 patches instead of one, as drivers/ata/ and
> drivers/ide/ are different subsystems...
Possibly, but these patches should go in via the OF tree anyway, so
collecting ACKs should be sufficient.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists