linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 33/37] sound/soc: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in struct of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100312092619.6a6f5e20@hyperion.delvare>
Date:	Fri, 12 Mar 2010 09:26:19 +0100
From:	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>
To:	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>, monstr@...str.eu,
	gregkh@...e.de, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, davem@...emloft.net,
	sfr@...b.auug.org.au, jgarzik@...ox.com, ben-linux@...ff.org,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, jeremy.kerr@...onical.com,
	James.Bottomley@...e.de, microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
	alsa-devel@...a-project.org, timur@...escale.com,
	lrg@...mlogic.co.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 33/37] sound/soc: use .dev.of_node instead of .node in 
  struct of_device

On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:22:37 -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Mark Brown
> <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:06:50AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> .node is being removed
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
> >
> > Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
> >
> > but please ensure that Liam and especially Timur also check this (both
> > CCed).
> >
> > For enormous patch serieses like this it's really nice if you can ensure
> > that each person is only CCed on the patches that they need to review.
> > Much less stuff in the inbox.
> 
> Yeah, sorry about that (and to everyone receiving this thread, I'm
> really sorry.  I won't do it again).  I've already been yelled at for
> that.  What happened is that on a previous series I was yelled at for
> not sending all patches to everyone (so that the patches could be
> reviewed in context).  So, naturally, I made sure to include everyone
> on the whole series this time....  doh.
> 
> Next time I post I'll constrain it to small chunks.

A good compromise IMHO is to send only the pieces they really have to
see and ack to each person, and provide a pointer to somewhere the full
series can be seen and downloaded for the interested.

-- 
Jean Delvare
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/