linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 5] early PV on HVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1003121819500.27222@kaball-desktop>
Date:	Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:09:54 +0000
From:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
To:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC:	Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 5] early PV on HVM

On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 03/10/2010 07:47 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > this patch:
> >
> > - adds a xen_guest_init hook in setup.c right after kvm_guest_init;
> >
> > - initializes basic pv on hvm features in xen_guest_init;
> >    
> 
> Is this 64-bit specific like Sheng's version?
> 
> I also asked him to move the setup code out of enlighten.c into a new 
> file, though your version is a fair bit smaller.
> 

My version is not 64-bit specific, should I move it to a new file
anyway?

I was trying to keep the differences with Sheng's version low, but in
this case I am not quite sure how to manage it.
Suggestions are welcome.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/