| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100312195257.GB17689@tuxdriver.com> Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:52:57 -0500 From: "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com> To: Florian Mickler <florian@...kler.org> Cc: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>, Alan Jenkins <alan-jenkins@...fmail.co.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] rfkill sysfs ABI On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 07:18:19PM +0100, Florian Mickler wrote: > sorry! I just realised that you already have the blocked_sw / blocked_hw one's > queued. > > This just changes the name of blocked_sw and blocked_hw to "soft" and > "hard". > > I don't know what you wanna do. I'm fine with blocked_hw and > blocked_sw as it's referenced as such (hw/sw) in the code, but Marcel > wanted to get away from the "hard blocked by hardware" notation, as it > suggests that the transmitter could only be blocked by hardware... Could you just submit a third patch that makes the requested name changes? Thanks! John -- John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@...driver.com might be all we have. Be ready. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists