[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B9AA5A9.20609@goop.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:35:53 -0800
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To: Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>
CC: xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"Yaozu (Eddie) Dong" <eddie.dong@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@...citrix.com>,
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][v9 4/6] xen/hvm: Xen PV extension of HVM
initialization
On 03/11/2010 06:57 PM, Sheng Yang wrote:
> The PV extended HVM(once known as Hybrid) is started from real mode like
> HVM guest, but also with a component based PV feature selection(e.g. PV halt,
> PV timer, event channel, then PV drivers). So guest can takes the advantages
> of both H/W virtualization and Para-Virtualization.
>
> This patch introduced the PV extension of HVM guest initialization.
>
> Guest would detect the capability using CPUID 0x40000002.edx, then call
> HVMOP_enable_pv hypercall to enable pv support in hypervisor.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sheng Yang<sheng@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yaozu (Eddie) Dong<eddie.dong@...el.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/cpuid.h | 5 +
> arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h | 12 +++
> arch/x86/xen/Kconfig | 4 +
> arch/x86/xen/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/x86/xen/hvmpv.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/xen/interface/hvm/hvm_op.h | 8 ++
> 6 files changed, 165 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 arch/x86/xen/hvmpv.c
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/cpuid.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/cpuid.h
> index 8787f03..b3a0b3a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/cpuid.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/cpuid.h
> @@ -65,4 +65,9 @@
> #define _XEN_CPUID_FEAT1_MMU_PT_UPDATE_PRESERVE_AD 0
> #define XEN_CPUID_FEAT1_MMU_PT_UPDATE_PRESERVE_AD (1u<<0)
>
> +#define _XEN_CPUID_FEAT2_HVM_PV 0
> +#define XEN_CPUID_FEAT2_HVM_PV (1u<<0)
> +#define _XEN_CPUID_FEAT2_HVM_PV_CLOCK 1
> +#define XEN_CPUID_FEAT2_HVM_PV_CLOCK (1u<<1)
> +
> #endif /* __XEN_PUBLIC_ARCH_X86_CPUID_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> index d5b7e90..7569f64 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/xen/hypervisor.h
> @@ -55,6 +55,18 @@ extern enum xen_domain_type xen_domain_type;
> #define xen_hvm_domain() (xen_domain()&& \
> xen_domain_type == XEN_HVM_DOMAIN)
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_XEN_HVM_PV
> +
> +#define XEN_HVM_PV_CLOCK_ENABLED (1u<< 0)
>
Why is this flag needed? As far as I understand it, there's no real
underlying hypervisor change needed to make HVM access to pv clock
possible; its just a field in the shared_info's vcpu struct after all.
Even if you enable this feature unconditionally, the user can still
control whether the Xen clocksource is used with the "clocksource="
kernel command-line parameter.
Also, there's nothing about this which is 64-bit specific is there?
Thanks,
J
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists