linux-kernel - Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] memcg: wake up filter in oom waitqueue

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100312120341.857de693.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Mar 2010 12:03:41 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
Cc:	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	kirill@...temov.name
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] memcg: wake up filter in oom waitqueue

On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:54:29 +0900
Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:

> On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:38:38 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 11:30:28 +0900
> > Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:55:59 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
> > > > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> > > > +	/* check hierarchy */
> > > > +	if (!css_is_ancestor(&oom_wait_info->mem->css, &wake_mem->css) &&
> > > > +	    !css_is_ancestor(&wake_mem->css, &oom_wait_info->mem->css))
> > > > +		return 0;
> > > > +
> > > I think these conditions are wrong.
> > > This can wake up tasks in oom_wait_info->mem when:
> > > 
> > >   00/ <- wake_mem: use_hierarchy == false
> > >     aa/ <- oom_wait_info->mem: use_hierarchy == true;
> > > 
> > Hmm. I think this line bails out above case.
> > 
> > > +	if (!oom_wait_info->mem->use_hierarchy || !wake_mem->use_hierarchy)
> > > +		return 0;
> > 
> > No ?
> > 
> Oops! you're right. I misunderstood the code.
> 
> Then, this patch looks good to me.
> 
> 	Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nishimura <nishimura@....nes.nec.co.jp>
> 

Thank you very much!

-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/