[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac3eb2511003112129i2274b018m7e059f348d5f983a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2010 06:29:58 +0100
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomasw@...il.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware class: export nowait to userspace
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 05:46, Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 05:21 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> The firmware_class already always exports a TIMEOUT= value, right? If
>> this is the case, it should be set to 0, I guess.
>
> Yes and no. It is exported, but typically it will be 60 seconds. And
> even in this case it makes sense to eventually time out when userspace
> is not responding.
Ok, I didn't expect the async version to time out. Sounds fine then.
>> Sounds fine to have a flag like this, while "NOWAIT" is, I guess, a
>> pretty bad name from the event perspective. This name might make sense
>> for the called kernel function, but not so much for a firmware loader
>> instruction.
>
> Yeah, I can agree with that. How about "ASYNC" or so? It needs to
> distinguish between "I'm going to wait for this please respond" and "I'm
> not really waiting, please let me now when you can".
Yeah, sounds fine to me.
Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists