linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5][GIT PULL][2.6.34] tracing: urgent fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100313072512.GA4892@elte.hu>
Date:	Sat, 13 Mar 2010 08:25:12 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][GIT PULL][2.6.34] tracing: urgent fixes


* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> Ingo,
> 
> Li Zefan and Lai Jiangshan told me they were finding various bugs
> with running a stress test. I asked for this test, and Li sent it
> to me. Running the test I was also able to trigger the same bugs that
> they were seeing. Unfortunately, these bugs were very hard to figure
> out and it took me most of the week to fix them.
> 
> These bugs would most likely not happen in normal use, since they
> all require multiple users writing to the control files of ftrace.
> This stress test does just that, it creates several processes that
> each write to a different part of a ftrace control system. One resizes
> the ring buffer, the other enables and disables various options,
> another changes the ftrace plugins, another enables and disables
> various events, another enables and disables the tracer, etc.
> 
> Normal use generally has a single user that would only do one of these
> actions at a time. But that is no excuse for not fixing the issues
> that this test uncovered, so I took this very seriously.
> 
> Even the fix "tracing: Disable buffer switching when starting or
> stopping trace" may look like it could happen if wakeup tracer is running,
> but since opening the trace file would cause the wakeup tracer to stop,
> it actually required another task to change the current tracer to
> the wakeup tracer while the trace file was being read.
> 
> In any event, I've been running Li's ftrace_stress_test for a few
> hours now, and it seems pretty stable with these patches. I'll continue
> to run it to see if it finds anything else.
> 
> All of these patches I consider urgent and have also Cc'd stable on them.
> 
> Please pull the latest tip/tracing/urgent tree, which can be found at:
> 
>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-trace.git
> tip/tracing/urgent
> 
> 
> Lai Jiangshan (1):
>       ring-buffer: Move disabled check into preempt disable section
> 
> Steven Rostedt (4):
>       function-graph: Init curr_ret_stack with ret_stack
>       tracing: Use same local variable when resetting the ring buffer
>       tracing: Disable buffer switching when starting or stopping trace
>       tracing: Do not record user stack trace from NMI context
> 
> ----
>  kernel/trace/ftrace.c      |    2 +-
>  kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c |   12 ++++++------
>  kernel/trace/trace.c       |   24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
>  3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Pulled, thanks a lot Steve!

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/