[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100313083359.GB22494@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Mar 2010 00:33:59 -0800
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arch/mips/txx9/generic: init dynamic bin_attribute
structures
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 03:28:55AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:34:51AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 08:03:49AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > Commit 6992f5334995af474c2b58d010d08bc597f0f2fe introduced this requirement.
> > > Found with coccinelle, but fixed manually. Compile tested on X86 where
> > > possible.
> > >
> >
> > Regarding all 3 - it looks like these dynamically alocated attributes
> > could be converted to statically allocated ones. I'd recommend doing
> > that instead (in fact, I posted patch for the firmware_class couple days
> > ago).
>
> I agree for the firmware-patch. Regarding the MIPS one, 'size' might differ and
> 'private' will differ per instance. Regarding the RTC driver, 'size' might also
> differ. I don't know if somebody really wants two RTCs or the SRAM for MIPS can
> be instantiated more than once. Unless somebody with actual hardware jumps in,
> I'd say better safe than sorry.
>
Ah, right, size... I forgot about it. You are right, making the other 2
static is not an option.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists