[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cfd18e0f1003132118y21bd71band2d07ae85c8d4c9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 06:18:50 +0100
From: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@...ibm.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
SELinux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ch.ncsc.mil>,
Kees Cook <kees.cook@...onical.com>,
Andrew Morgan <morgan@...nel.org>,
"Christopher J. PeBenito" <cpebenito@...sys.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...isplace.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Define CAP_SYSLOG
> There is one downside to this patch: If some site or distro currently
> has syslogd/whatever running as a non-root user with cap_sys_admin+pe,
> then it will need to be changed to run with cap_syslog+pe. I don't
> know if there are such sites, or if that concern means we should take
> a different approach to introducing this change, or simply refuse this
> change.
*If* this is a problem, would the way to address it not be to permit
syslog if the caller has *either* CAP_SYS_ADMIN or CAP_SYSLOG? (The
only weakness I see in this idea is that it fails to lighten the
hugely overlaoded CAP_SYS_ADMIN.)
Cheers,
Michael
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Author of "The Linux Programming Interface" http://blog.man7.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists