[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B9DE635.8030208@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:48:05 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: KVM development list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RF C/T/D] Unmapped page cache control - via boot parameter
On 03/15/2010 09:22 AM, Balbir Singh wrote:
> Selectively control Unmapped Page Cache (nospam version)
>
> From: Balbir Singh<balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This patch implements unmapped page cache control via preferred
> page cache reclaim. The current patch hooks into kswapd and reclaims
> page cache if the user has requested for unmapped page control.
> This is useful in the following scenario
>
> - In a virtualized environment with cache!=none, we see
> double caching - (one in the host and one in the guest). As
> we try to scale guests, cache usage across the system grows.
> The goal of this patch is to reclaim page cache when Linux is running
> as a guest and get the host to hold the page cache and manage it.
> There might be temporary duplication, but in the long run, memory
> in the guests would be used for mapped pages.
>
Well, for a guest, host page cache is a lot slower than guest page cache.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists