[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B9E391A.5050808@pelagicore.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:41:46 +0100
From: Richard Röjfors <richard.rojfors@...agicore.com>
To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: Two branches the same in timbuart_set_mctrl()
On 03/15/2010 02:33 PM, Roel Kluin wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
>>> if (mctrl& TIOCM_RTS)
>>> iowrite8(TIMBUART_CTRL_RTS, port->membase + TIMBUART_CTRL);
>>> else
>>> - iowrite8(TIMBUART_CTRL_RTS, port->membase + TIMBUART_CTRL);
>>> + iowrite8(TIMBUART_CTRL_CTS, port->membase + TIMBUART_CTRL);
>>
>> This is not completely correct. CTS is a read only bit and we are to
>> stop signal RTS. So the line should look like:
>> iowrite8(0, port->membase + TIMBUART_CTRL);
>
> It appears as if this will also unset TIMBUART_CTRL_CTS (which is
> probably ok since it's read-only) but TIMBUART_CTRL_FLSHTX and
> TIMBUART_CTRL_FLSHRX as well.
TIMBUART_CTRL_FLSH(RX/TX) are write only bits, writing a 1 to these will
flush the corresponding FIFO. In this case we should not flush the FIFO:s,
so writing 0 as I suggested is correct.
>
> If not required I'll send the patch as you suggested.
Great! Thanks!
--Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists