[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100315194739.GD10896@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 20:47:39 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, andi@...stfloor.org,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] call_usermodehelper: no need to unblock signals
____call_usermodehelper() correctly calls flush_signal_handlers()
to set SIG_DFL, but sigemptyset(->blocked) and recalc_sigpending()
are not needed.
This kthread was forked by workqueue thread, all signals must be
unblocked and ignored, no pending signal is possible.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/kmod.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
--- 34-rc1/kernel/kmod.c~3_DONT_UNBLOCK 2010-03-15 20:10:12.000000000 +0100
+++ 34-rc1/kernel/kmod.c 2010-03-15 20:17:47.000000000 +0100
@@ -134,11 +134,8 @@ static int ____call_usermodehelper(void
struct subprocess_info *sub_info = data;
int retval;
- /* Unblock all signals */
spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
flush_signal_handlers(current, 1);
- sigemptyset(¤t->blocked);
- recalc_sigpending();
spin_unlock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
/* We can run anywhere, unlike our parent keventd(). */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists