lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B9EA162.2000706@server-speed.net>
Date:	Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:06:42 +0100
From:	Florian Pritz <bluewind@...ver-speed.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	sxxe@....de, thomas@...hlinux.org
Subject: Bad performance after suspend on Intel i7 and i5

Hi,

When I run make -j12 (on a kernel tree) all 8 cores are at 100% each.
(Can also be tested with stress -c 8 or any multithreaded program)
After a suspend2ram (using pm-suspend) only one single core is at 100%
and the others are somewhere between 0% and 10% though not 100% like
before.

This bug is reproduceable on at least 3 machines, running on i7-920,
i7-860 and i5-520M.
Tested kernels are 2.6.33-ARCH (config [1]) , 2.6.32.9-ARCH and
2.6.34-rc1-00005-g522dba7 (only be me; config [2]).

/proc/cpuinfo shows 8 cpus before and after suspend.

My own hardware:
CPU: Intel i7-920
Board: Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD4P [3]
RAM: 8GB
Arch: x86_64 (all 3)
Distribution: Archlinux (all 3)

I don't know of any older good kernel, so sadly can't bisect anything.

Thanks for looking into that issue.

[1]
http://repos.archlinux.org/wsvn/packages/kernel26/trunk/config.x86_64?rev=70484&peg=70484
[2] http://flo.xssn.at/~flo/tmp/kernel-config
[3]
http://www.gigabyte.com.tw/Products/Motherboard/Products_Overview.aspx?ProductID=2986

-- 
Greetings,
Florian Pritz -- {flo,bluewind}@...ver-speed.net
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ