linux-kernel - Re: [Stable-review] [19/39] e100: Use pci pool to work around GFP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	shemminger@...tta.com
Cc:	gregkh@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	roger.oksanen@...helsinki.fi
Subject: Re: [Stable-review] [19/39] e100: Use pci pool to work around
 GFP_ATOMIC order 5 memory allocation failure

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:36:53 -0700

> The kernel has both fixes in it. The customer reported that if both
> were reverted, the kernel panic went away.

Please recheck that as your backtrace matches exactly the
crash signature fixed by the memset().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/