[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1268692288.3040.2.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:31:28 -0400
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfs: pass struct file to do_truncate on O_TRUNC opens
On Mon, 2010-03-15 at 17:39 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
> When a file is opened with O_TRUNC, the truncate processing is handled
> by handle_truncate(). This function however doesn't receive any info
> about the newly instantiated filp, and therefore can't pass that info
> along so that the setattr can use it.
>
> This makes NFSv4 misbehave. The client does an open and gets a valid
> stateid, and then doesn't use that stateid on the subsequent truncate.
> It uses the zero-stateid instead. Most servers ignore this fact and
> just do the truncate anyway, but some don't like it (notably, RHEL4).
>
> It seems more correct that since we have a fully instantiated file at
> the time that handle_truncate is called, that we pass that along so
> that the truncate operation can properly use it.
At least in the O_CREAT|O_TRUNC case, we really should modify
nfs4_opendata_alloc() to set the attrs.ia_size to zero, so that the
server does an atomic open(O_CREAT|O_TRUNC) for us (see the DESCRIPTION
paragraph in RFC3530 section 14.2.16). There shouldn't be any need for
an extra truncate RPC call.
Plain open(O_TRUNC) probably does need something along the lines of what
you propose, however.
Cheers
Trond
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists