[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28c262361003141728g4aa40901hb040144c5a4aeeed@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 09:28:08 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] mm,migration: Do not try to migrate unmapped
anonymous pages
Hi, Mel.
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 1:41 AM, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
> rmap_walk_anon() was triggering errors in memory compaction that looks like
> use-after-free errors in anon_vma. The problem appears to be that between
> the page being isolated from the LRU and rcu_read_lock() being taken, the
> mapcount of the page dropped to 0 and the anon_vma was freed. This patch
> skips the migration of anon pages that are not mapped by anyone.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> ---
> mm/migrate.c | 10 ++++++++++
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
> index 98eaaf2..3c491e3 100644
> --- a/mm/migrate.c
> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
> @@ -602,6 +602,16 @@ static int unmap_and_move(new_page_t get_new_page, unsigned long private,
> * just care Anon page here.
> */
> if (PageAnon(page)) {
> + /*
> + * If the page has no mappings any more, just bail. An
> + * unmapped anon page is likely to be freed soon but worse,
> + * it's possible its anon_vma disappeared between when
> + * the page was isolated and when we reached here while
> + * the RCU lock was not held
> + */
> + if (!page_mapcount(page))
As looking code about mapcount of page, I got confused.
I think mapcount of page is protected by pte lock.
But I can't find pte lock in unmap_and_move.
If I am right, what protects race between this condition check and
rcu_read_lock?
This patch makes race window very small but It can't remove race totally.
I think I am missing something.
Pz, point me out. :)
> + goto uncharge;
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
> rcu_locked = 1;
> anon_vma = page_anon_vma(page);
> --
> 1.6.5
>
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists