[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100316135346.GB9144@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:53:46 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Gui Jianfeng <GuiJianfeng@...fujitsu.com>,
Ben Blum <bblum@...rew.cmu.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"containers@...ts.osdl.org" <containers@...ts.osdl.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: make CONFIG_BLK_CGROUP visible
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 09:36:41AM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> >> ---help---
> >> Generic block IO controller cgroup interface. This is the common
> >> @@ -91,7 +92,7 @@ config BLK_CGROUP
> >> to such task groups.
> >>
> >> config DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP
> >> - bool
> >> + bool "Block cgroup debugging help"
> >
> >
> > Why are you making DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP this as a user visible/configurable
> > option? This is already controlled by DEBUG_CFQ_IOSCHED. If you don't want
> > the DEBUG overhead, just set DEBUG_CFQ_IOSCHED=n and DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP will
> > not be selected? Making it user visible does not seem to be buying us
> > anything?
> >
>
> Sounds reasonable. A minor question, since DEBUG_BLK_CGROUP is not
> visible, the help message for this config is not visible too, so we
> still keep it?
Right now the message is only for developer if somebody opens the Kconfig
file. I think it does not harm if somebody wants to understand what this
config option is doing. But if you think that it should not be there, I have
no strong opinion about it.
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists