lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B9F8E7F.7070709@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:58:23 +0100
From:	Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: locking issue in vhost_net_set_backend

Hi,

Stanse found a locking problem in the following function:

static long vhost_net_set_backend(struct vhost_net *n, unsigned index, 
int fd)
{
         struct socket *sock, *oldsock;
         struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
         int r;

         mutex_lock(&n->dev.mutex);
         r = vhost_dev_check_owner(&n->dev);
         if (r)
                 goto err;

         if (index >= VHOST_NET_VQ_MAX) {
                 r = -ENOBUFS;
                 goto err;
         }
         vq = n->vqs + index;
         mutex_lock(&vq->mutex);        <---  locked

         /* Verify that ring has been setup correctly. */
         if (!vhost_vq_access_ok(vq)) {
                 r = -EFAULT;
                 goto err;              <--- not unlocked
         }
         sock = get_socket(fd);
         if (IS_ERR(sock)) {
                 r = PTR_ERR(sock);
                 goto err;              <--- not unlocked
         }

         /* start polling new socket */
         oldsock = vq->private_data;
         if (sock == oldsock)
                 goto done;             <--- not unlocked

         vhost_net_disable_vq(n, vq);
         rcu_assign_pointer(vq->private_data, sock);
         vhost_net_enable_vq(n, vq);
         mutex_unlock(&vq->mutex);
done:
         if (oldsock) {
                 vhost_net_flush_vq(n, index);
                 fput(oldsock->file);
         }
err:
         mutex_unlock(&n->dev.mutex);
         return r;
}


I don't see how the lock is unlocked on the error paths and as it is not 
on none of the them maybe I'm missing something?

thanks,
-- 
js
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ