[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4B9F9361.6060208@linux.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 07:19:13 -0700
From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
CC: Robert Schöne <robert.schoene@...dresden.de>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cpufreq <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace power_frequency events on the correct cpu (for
Intel x86 CPUs)
> But something else...:
> What exactly is the power tracer good for and what is it
> capable of which cpufreq_stats is not capable to do?
look at timechart for example.....
it's extremely useful to have this for us that do power tuning...
cpufreq_stats is nice but not nearly good enough since you only get averages,
not time behavior.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists