[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1634wp9zx.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 11:22:10 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...e.de>,
Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-ide\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Taylor <Daniel.Taylor@....com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>,
tytso@....edu, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
hirofumi@...l.parknet.co.jp,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, irtiger@...il.com,
Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>, aschnell@...e.de,
knikanth@...e.de, jdelvare@...e.de
Subject: Re: ATA 4 KiB sector issues.
>>>>> "Tejun" == Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> writes:
Tejun> * Anything remotely modern (>= XP) doesn't give a hoot about
Tejun> cylinder alignment.
Tejun> * Anything older (<= 2000) is very likely to get confused with
Tejun> custom geometry starting from the BIOS itself. For those
Tejun> cases, the only thing we can do is aligning partitions to
Tejun> cylinders abiding BIOS supplied geometry parameters which will
Tejun> usually be 255/63.
Tejun> So, using custom geometry doesn't help compatibility at all.
Great reads on this topic. Might be worth linking to:
http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/partitions/partition_types.html
http://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/linux/largedisk.html
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists