[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1268760010.10129.31253.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 17:20:10 +0000
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"Yaozu (Eddie) Dong" <eddie.dong@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Pratt <Ian.Pratt@...citrix.com>,
Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][v9 4/6] xen/hvm: Xen PV extension of HVM
initialization
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 17:12 +0000, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> If we need a new vcpuop to make it work
> properly anyway (set tsc offset), then the presence of that should be
> a
> good indicator. In other words, make it depend on its actual fixed
> pre-reqs, rather than a specific flag for the feature.
I don't think a new hypercall is required. Xen should simply pre-account
for the TSC offset which HVM guests are subject to in
__update_vcpu_system_time.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists