[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1268765284.2932.17.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 19:48:04 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] r8169: Fix rtl8169_rx_interrupt()
Le mardi 16 mars 2010 à 20:26 +0200, Sergey Senozhatsky a écrit :
> Hello,
> Got it right now.
>
> System completely froze. Even SysRq didn't work.
> /*spin_lock deadlock?*/
>
> NOTE: I'm losing network constantly with pktgen tests
yes, every 12 seconds there is a reset because of fifo overflow
> [24208.010980] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
> [24220.010980] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
> [24232.011030] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
> [24340.010980] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
> [24352.010966] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
> [24364.010966] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
> [24376.010964] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
> [24388.010961] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
> [24400.010959] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
> [24412.010963] r8169 0000:02:00.0: eth0: link up
>
>
> Traces:
> [24600.625078] INFO: task events/0:9 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> [24600.625083] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> [24600.625087] events/0 D 00001636 0 9 2 0x00000000
> [24600.625096] f7085ebc 00000046 a87e9490 00001636 c1617cc0 c1617cc0 c1617cc0 c1617cc0
> [24600.625109] f707c250 c1617cc0 c1617cc0 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000 f707bfc0
> [24600.625122] c14745c8 c14745c8 f707bfc0 00000202 f7085efc c12c6449 00000000 00085edc
> [24600.625135] Call Trace:
> [24600.625148] [<c12c6449>] __mutex_lock_common+0x233/0x3af
> [24600.625155] [<c12c65ff>] mutex_lock_nested+0x12/0x15
> [24600.625163] [<c1265e0f>] ? rtnl_lock+0xf/0x11
> [24600.625168] [<c1265e0f>] rtnl_lock+0xf/0x11
> [24600.625183] [<f9174acd>] rtl8169_reset_task+0x16/0xee [r8169]
> [24600.625191] [<c103c887>] worker_thread+0x161/0x233
> [24600.625196] [<c103c845>] ? worker_thread+0x11f/0x233
> [24600.625205] [<f9174ab7>] ? rtl8169_reset_task+0x0/0xee [r8169]
> [24600.625214] [<c103f9f1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2f
> [24600.625220] [<c103c726>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x233
> [24600.625225] [<c103f6ce>] kthread+0x6a/0x6f
> [24600.625232] [<c103f664>] ? kthread+0x0/0x6f
> [24600.625238] [<c1002e42>] kernel_thread_helper+0x6/0x1a
> [24600.625242] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
> [24600.625259] INFO: task X:3176 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
> [24600.625262] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> [24600.625266] X D 00000000 0 3176 3175 0x00400004
> [24600.625273] f6435a10 00003046 00025709 00000000 c1617cc0 c1617cc0 c1617cc0 c1617cc0
> [24600.625286] f60897d0 c1617c ...
> /*THE REST IS LOST*/
>
>
OK thanks for the report, this rtl8169_reset_task() seems pretty buggy,
or multiple invocation...
Did you tried removing the rtl8169_schedule_work() call from
rtl8169_rx_interrupt() ?
Maybe the reset is not necessary at all in case of fifo overflow..
Cumulative patch :
diff --git a/drivers/net/r8169.c b/drivers/net/r8169.c
index 9d3ebf3..d6ef4dd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/r8169.c
+++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c
@@ -1038,14 +1038,14 @@ static void rtl8169_vlan_rx_register(struct net_device *dev,
}
static int rtl8169_rx_vlan_skb(struct rtl8169_private *tp, struct RxDesc *desc,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
+ struct sk_buff *skb, int polling)
{
u32 opts2 = le32_to_cpu(desc->opts2);
struct vlan_group *vlgrp = tp->vlgrp;
int ret;
if (vlgrp && (opts2 & RxVlanTag)) {
- vlan_hwaccel_receive_skb(skb, vlgrp, swab16(opts2 & 0xffff));
+ __vlan_hwaccel_rx(skb, vlgrp, swab16(opts2 & 0xffff), polling);
ret = 0;
} else
ret = -1;
@@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@ static inline u32 rtl8169_tx_vlan_tag(struct rtl8169_private *tp,
}
static int rtl8169_rx_vlan_skb(struct rtl8169_private *tp, struct RxDesc *desc,
- struct sk_buff *skb)
+ struct sk_buff *skb, int polling)
{
return -1;
}
@@ -4429,12 +4429,20 @@ out:
return done;
}
+/*
+ * Warning : rtl8169_rx_interrupt() might be called :
+ * 1) from NAPI (softirq) context
+ * (polling = 1 : we should call netif_receive_skb())
+ * 2) from process context (rtl8169_reset_task())
+ * (polling = 0 : we must call netif_rx() instead)
+ */
static int rtl8169_rx_interrupt(struct net_device *dev,
struct rtl8169_private *tp,
void __iomem *ioaddr, u32 budget)
{
unsigned int cur_rx, rx_left;
unsigned int delta, count;
+ int polling = (budget != ~(u32)0) ? 1 : 0;
cur_rx = tp->cur_rx;
rx_left = NUM_RX_DESC + tp->dirty_rx - cur_rx;
@@ -4459,7 +4467,6 @@ static int rtl8169_rx_interrupt(struct net_device *dev,
if (status & RxCRC)
dev->stats.rx_crc_errors++;
if (status & RxFOVF) {
- rtl8169_schedule_work(dev, rtl8169_reset_task);
dev->stats.rx_fifo_errors++;
}
rtl8169_mark_to_asic(desc, tp->rx_buf_sz);
@@ -4496,8 +4503,12 @@ static int rtl8169_rx_interrupt(struct net_device *dev,
skb_put(skb, pkt_size);
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, dev);
- if (rtl8169_rx_vlan_skb(tp, desc, skb) < 0)
- netif_receive_skb(skb);
+ if (rtl8169_rx_vlan_skb(tp, desc, skb, polling) < 0) {
+ if (likely(polling))
+ netif_receive_skb(skb);
+ else
+ netif_rx(skb);
+ }
dev->stats.rx_bytes += pkt_size;
dev->stats.rx_packets++;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists