linux-kernel - Re: RFC: direct MTD support for SquashFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Mar 2010 22:18:31 +0300
From:	Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@...il.com>
To:	Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk>
Cc:	Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu>,
	Phillip Lougher <phillip@...gher.demon.co.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC: direct MTD support for SquashFS

On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Peter Korsgaard <jacmet@...site.dk> wrote:
>>>>>> "Ferenc" == Ferenc Wagner <wferi@...f.hu> writes:
>  Ferenc> For now, 2.6.34 gained pluggable decompressors, so this patch
>  Ferenc> does not apply anymore, though the main idea holds.  My
>  Ferenc> questions: is the community interested in integrating something
>  Ferenc> like this, should this patch transformed into something
>  Ferenc> acceptable, or am I a total lunatic?  I don't know a thing
>  Ferenc> about filesystem development, but willing to learn and
>  Ferenc> refactor.  Comments welcome.
>
> Nice, I have been thinking about that as well. What kind of size savings
> are you getting with this?

Yeah, I'm interested in that as well.

~Vitaly
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/