linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Driver core: Reduce the level of request

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201003160117.59116.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Tue, 16 Mar 2010 01:17:59 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderlinux@...il.com>,
	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Driver core: Reduce the level of request_firmware() messages

On Tuesday 16 March 2010, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 05:04:09AM +0530, Jaswinder Singh Rajput wrote:
> > Hello Rafael,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:57 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> > >
> > > I still think it's a good idea.  The information about what firmware is being
> > > used doesn't seem to be very useful for anything but debugging, so I think
> > > KERN_DEBUG is actually the right level for these messages.
> > >
> > 
> > Can we use printk_once()
> 
> No, I'd rather use dev_dbg() that way we can dynamically turn it on and
> off as needed.  I took Rafael's original patch.

OK, thanks!

> Funny thing is, someone else also sent the same patch, so there must be
> others wanting this change :)

I know SGI wants it at least.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/