[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BA085DE.40604@dcl.info.waseda.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:33:50 +0900
From: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, h.mitake@...il.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/11] lock monitor: Separate features related to
lock
On 03/17/10 10:47, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 07:38:37PM +0900, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
>> I implemented it on the branch perf/inject of Frederic's
random-tracing tree.
>> Because the branch is hottest place of lock and tracing :)
>
>
> Ouch! You shouldn't do this. The patches inside were
> trials submitted for review and the resulting discussion
> concluded that the injection must be redesigned.
Oh, sorry...
And I'd like to look at redesigning way of inject.
>
> More generally I don't recommend you to base your patches
> on my tree. I use it as a buffer when I send patches
> for review or for pull requests.
>
> The branches inside can be randomly rebased (unless a
> branch is waiting to be pulled) and they are pretty async
> with the -tip tree.
>
> The hottest and most sync tree on which you should base your patches
> for perf is:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git
> perf/core
>
> With that you have best chances to work on a sane and up-to-date
> base.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
I'll work on tip/perf/core from next time :)
Thanks,
Hitoshi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists