linux-kernel - Re: private field in led

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1268830117.3662.15.camel@rex>
Date:	Wed, 17 Mar 2010 12:48:37 +0000
From:	Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>
To:	Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
Cc:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	lenz@...wisc.edu, rpurdie@...nedhand.com
Subject: Re: private field in led_classdev?

On Wed, 2010-03-10 at 12:01 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Wed 10 Mar 2010 10:44:52 +0100, a écrit :
> > Greg KH, le Tue 09 Mar 2010 18:54:11 -0800, a écrit :
> > > What's wrong with using the private pointer in the struct device
> > > instead?
> > 
> > Ah, right. In my case there is a struct device corresponding to the
> > actual input device. I hadn't realized that since registering a led
> > creates a new device, I have another private pointer which I can use.
> 
> One issue, however, is that led_classdev_register() calls
> led_trigger_set_default(), which eventually calls the brightness_set
> hook, but the private field (platform_data) still hasn't been
> initialized, so the brightness_set hook has to abort setting the initial
> state. In my case, after led_classdev_register and setting
> platform_data, I can call the low level function by hand, it's just not
> very pretty...

That is a bit ugly :/.

It would probably make sense to pass that parameter to
led_classdev_register() but changing references to that function
everywhere will be a pain.

I'm tempted to make led_classdev_register() a wrapper around a
led_classdev_register_drvdata() function which takes an extra parameter.

I agree using the private pointer makes sense though.

Cheers,

Richard

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/