[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1003171132560.1734-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 11:34:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
cc: gregkh@...e.de, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] V2 usb console improvements series
On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Jason Wessel wrote:
> On 03/17/2010 09:30 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Mar 2010, Jason Wessel wrote:
> >
> >
> >> Part of having the console stable requires that usb sysrq handler get
> >> executed in a tasklet. The hcd device lock is always held while the
> >> driver call backs are executed. The means you cannot get the sysrq
> >> printk's out to the usb console device after the in_flight urb queue
> >> is filled.
> >>
> >
> > Either I don't understand this comment properly or else it is simply
> > wrong. HCDs do not continue to hold their locks when handing completed
> > URBs back to drivers. The giveback call occurs with interrupts
> > disabled, but no locks are held.
> >
> >
>
> The call back from the urb processing holds a lock.
Which callback and which lock, exactly? Surely not the "hcd device
lock" as your description says, and maybe not the "driver call back".
Alan Stern
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists