[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100317004136.GC17472@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2010 20:41:36 -0400
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
oerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>, ziteng.huang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics from host side
Hi -
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 06:04:10PM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> [...]
> The only way to really address this is to change the interaction.
> Instead of running perf externally to qemu, we should support a perf
> command in the qemu monitor that can then tie directly to the perf
> tooling. That gives us the best possible user experience.
To what extent could this be solved with less crossing of
isolation/abstraction layers, if the perfctr facilities were properly
virtualized? That way guests could run perf goo internally.
Optionally virt tools on the host side could aggregate data from
cooperating self-monitoring guests.
- FChE
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists