[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <520f0cf11003180601k3a08d77ej24b98f833c8d1a9a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 14:01:11 +0100
From: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
oerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>, ziteng.huang@...el.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
"Fr?d?ric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single
project
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Frank Ch. Eigler <fche@...hat.com> wrote:
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> writes:
>
>> [...]
>> Distributions are very eager to update kernels even in stable periods of the
>> distro lifetime - they are much less willing to update user-space packages.
>> [...]
>
> Sorry, er, what? What distributions eagerly upgrade kernels in stable
> periods, were it not primarily motivated by security fixes? What users
> eagerly replace their kernels?
>
Us guys reading and participating on the list. ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists