[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100318200317.GG2423@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 13:03:17 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/urgent 2/2] rcu: remove INIT_RCU_HEAD,
RCU_HEAD_INIT, RCU_HEAD
On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 03:35:20PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> > From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> >
> > call_rcu() will unconditionally reinitialize RCU head anyway. New users
> > of these macros constantly appear, so remove them.
>
> Hrm. So do we have something that checks for double-use of a RCU head at
> the moment ? (using call_rcu() twice on the same head without being
> certain that the first callback have finished its execution).
>
> I think that hiding rcu head initialization into call_rcu() is one more
> step towards misuses that will silently corrupt rcu head lists. So I
> think we should first add the double-use debugging option before we
> remove the RCU head initializations.
So your thought is to have rcu_do_batch() do something like the
following?
...
next = list->next;
prefetch(next);
list->next = RCU_HEAD_INIT_PTR;
func = list->func;
list->func = RCU_HEAD_INIT_PTR;
func(list);
... /* touching anything referenced by "list" is use-after-free. */
Then have __call_rcu() do something like the following before initializing
the ->func and ->next pointers:
WARN_ON_ONCE(head->next != RCU_HEAD_INIT_PTR ||
head->func != RCU_HEAD_INIT_PTR);
And then require that all users of call_rcu() and friends use one of the
RCU_INIT() macros?
Or did you have something else in mind?
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
> > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > Acked-by: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.tmpl | 8 --------
> > arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c | 1 -
> > block/cfq-iosched.c | 1 -
> > block/genhd.c | 1 -
> > drivers/staging/batman-adv/hard-interface.c | 1 -
> > fs/file.c | 3 ---
> > fs/fs-writeback.c | 1 -
> > fs/partitions/check.c | 1 -
> > include/linux/init_task.h | 1 -
> > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 6 ------
> > mm/backing-dev.c | 1 -
> > mm/slob.c | 1 -
> > security/selinux/avc.c | 1 -
> > security/selinux/netnode.c | 2 --
> > 14 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.tmpl b/Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.tmpl
> > index 084f6ad..e6cc574 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.tmpl
> > +++ b/Documentation/DocBook/kernel-locking.tmpl
> > @@ -1725,14 +1725,6 @@ the amount of locking which needs to be done.
> > if (++cache_num > MAX_CACHE_SIZE) {
> > struct object *i, *outcast = NULL;
> > list_for_each_entry(i, &cache, list) {
> > -@@ -85,6 +94,7 @@
> > - obj->popularity = 0;
> > - atomic_set(&obj->refcnt, 1); /* The cache holds a reference */
> > - spin_lock_init(&obj->lock);
> > -+ INIT_RCU_HEAD(&obj->rcu);
> > -
> > - spin_lock_irqsave(&cache_lock, flags);
> > - __cache_add(obj);
> > @@ -104,12 +114,11 @@
> > struct object *cache_find(int id)
> > {
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> > index 99df697..82e38d1 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/pgtable.c
> > @@ -91,7 +91,6 @@ static void pte_free_rcu_callback(struct rcu_head *head)
> >
> > static void pte_free_submit(struct pte_freelist_batch *batch)
> > {
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&batch->rcu);
> > call_rcu(&batch->rcu, pte_free_rcu_callback);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > index dee9d93..caa2100 100644
> > --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> > @@ -3719,7 +3719,6 @@ static void *cfq_init_queue(struct request_queue *q)
> > * second, in order to have larger depth for async operations.
> > */
> > cfqd->last_delayed_sync = jiffies - HZ;
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&cfqd->rcu);
> > return cfqd;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/block/genhd.c b/block/genhd.c
> > index d13ba76..27e85a2 100644
> > --- a/block/genhd.c
> > +++ b/block/genhd.c
> > @@ -987,7 +987,6 @@ int disk_expand_part_tbl(struct gendisk *disk, int partno)
> > if (!new_ptbl)
> > return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&new_ptbl->rcu_head);
> > new_ptbl->len = target;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < len; i++)
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/batman-adv/hard-interface.c b/drivers/staging/batman-adv/hard-interface.c
> > index befd488..96ea0e5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/batman-adv/hard-interface.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/batman-adv/hard-interface.c
> > @@ -301,7 +301,6 @@ int hardif_add_interface(char *dev, int if_num)
> > batman_if->if_num = if_num;
> > batman_if->dev = dev;
> > batman_if->if_active = IF_INACTIVE;
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&batman_if->rcu);
> >
> > printk(KERN_INFO "batman-adv:Adding interface: %s\n", dev);
> > avail_ifs++;
> > diff --git a/fs/file.c b/fs/file.c
> > index 34bb7f7..cccaead 100644
> > --- a/fs/file.c
> > +++ b/fs/file.c
> > @@ -178,7 +178,6 @@ static struct fdtable * alloc_fdtable(unsigned int nr)
> > fdt->open_fds = (fd_set *)data;
> > data += nr / BITS_PER_BYTE;
> > fdt->close_on_exec = (fd_set *)data;
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&fdt->rcu);
> > fdt->next = NULL;
> >
> > return fdt;
> > @@ -312,7 +311,6 @@ struct files_struct *dup_fd(struct files_struct *oldf, int *errorp)
> > new_fdt->close_on_exec = (fd_set *)&newf->close_on_exec_init;
> > new_fdt->open_fds = (fd_set *)&newf->open_fds_init;
> > new_fdt->fd = &newf->fd_array[0];
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&new_fdt->rcu);
> > new_fdt->next = NULL;
> >
> > spin_lock(&oldf->file_lock);
> > @@ -430,7 +428,6 @@ struct files_struct init_files = {
> > .fd = &init_files.fd_array[0],
> > .close_on_exec = (fd_set *)&init_files.close_on_exec_init,
> > .open_fds = (fd_set *)&init_files.open_fds_init,
> > - .rcu = RCU_HEAD_INIT,
> > },
> > .file_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(init_task.file_lock),
> > };
> > diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > index 76fc4d5..a79d6c3 100644
> > --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> > @@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ static inline bool bdi_work_on_stack(struct bdi_work *work)
> > static inline void bdi_work_init(struct bdi_work *work,
> > struct wb_writeback_args *args)
> > {
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&work->rcu_head);
> > work->args = *args;
> > work->state = WS_USED;
> > }
> > diff --git a/fs/partitions/check.c b/fs/partitions/check.c
> > index e8865c1..03608a4 100644
> > --- a/fs/partitions/check.c
> > +++ b/fs/partitions/check.c
> > @@ -455,7 +455,6 @@ struct hd_struct *add_partition(struct gendisk *disk, int partno,
> > }
> >
> > /* everything is up and running, commence */
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&p->rcu_head);
> > rcu_assign_pointer(ptbl->part[partno], p);
> >
> > /* suppress uevent if the disk supresses it */
> > diff --git a/include/linux/init_task.h b/include/linux/init_task.h
> > index b1ed1cd..7996fc2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/init_task.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/init_task.h
> > @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ extern struct group_info init_groups;
> > { .first = &init_task.pids[PIDTYPE_PGID].node }, \
> > { .first = &init_task.pids[PIDTYPE_SID].node }, \
> > }, \
> > - .rcu = RCU_HEAD_INIT, \
> > .level = 0, \
> > .numbers = { { \
> > .nr = 0, \
> > diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > index 872a98e..7dd951e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > @@ -77,12 +77,6 @@ extern void rcu_scheduler_starting(void);
> > #error "Unknown RCU implementation specified to kernel configuration"
> > #endif
> >
> > -#define RCU_HEAD_INIT { .next = NULL, .func = NULL }
> > -#define RCU_HEAD(head) struct rcu_head head = RCU_HEAD_INIT
> > -#define INIT_RCU_HEAD(ptr) do { \
> > - (ptr)->next = NULL; (ptr)->func = NULL; \
> > -} while (0)
> > -
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> >
> > extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
> > diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
> > index 0e8ca03..4745647 100644
> > --- a/mm/backing-dev.c
> > +++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
> > @@ -653,7 +653,6 @@ int bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
> > bdi->max_ratio = 100;
> > bdi->max_prop_frac = PROP_FRAC_BASE;
> > spin_lock_init(&bdi->wb_lock);
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&bdi->rcu_head);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->bdi_list);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->wb_list);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&bdi->work_list);
> > diff --git a/mm/slob.c b/mm/slob.c
> > index 837ebd6..6de238d 100644
> > --- a/mm/slob.c
> > +++ b/mm/slob.c
> > @@ -647,7 +647,6 @@ void kmem_cache_free(struct kmem_cache *c, void *b)
> > if (unlikely(c->flags & SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU)) {
> > struct slob_rcu *slob_rcu;
> > slob_rcu = b + (c->size - sizeof(struct slob_rcu));
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&slob_rcu->head);
> > slob_rcu->size = c->size;
> > call_rcu(&slob_rcu->head, kmem_rcu_free);
> > } else {
> > diff --git a/security/selinux/avc.c b/security/selinux/avc.c
> > index 989fef8..bf4e3bc 100644
> > --- a/security/selinux/avc.c
> > +++ b/security/selinux/avc.c
> > @@ -288,7 +288,6 @@ static struct avc_node *avc_alloc_node(void)
> > if (!node)
> > goto out;
> >
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&node->rhead);
> > INIT_HLIST_NODE(&node->list);
> > avc_cache_stats_incr(allocations);
> >
> > diff --git a/security/selinux/netnode.c b/security/selinux/netnode.c
> > index 7100072..3dae9ef 100644
> > --- a/security/selinux/netnode.c
> > +++ b/security/selinux/netnode.c
> > @@ -182,8 +182,6 @@ static void sel_netnode_insert(struct sel_netnode *node)
> > BUG();
> > }
> >
> > - INIT_RCU_HEAD(&node->rcu);
> > -
> > /* we need to impose a limit on the growth of the hash table so check
> > * this bucket to make sure it is within the specified bounds */
> > list_add_rcu(&node->list, &sel_netnode_hash[idx].list);
> > --
> > 1.7.0
> >
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists