linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics fromhost side

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BA2A1CD.1070207@redhat.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:57:33 -0400
From:	William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>
To:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Enhance perf to collect KVM guest os statistics fromhost
 side

* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...xxxxx> wrote:

> * Avi Kivity <avi@...xxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Monitoring guests from the host is useful for kvm developers, but less so
> > for users.
> 
> Guest space profiling is easy, and 'perf kvm' is not about that. (plain 'perf'
> will work if a proper paravirt channel is opened to the host)
> 
> I think you might have misunderstood the purpose and role of the 'perf kvm'
> patch here? 'perf kvm' is aimed at KVM developers: it is them who improve KVM
> code, not guest kernel users.
> 
> Ingo

The software performance events work fine in a KVM guest. Do the hardware performance events work in KVM guest  environment? Last time I looked the results for the hardware counters were not sane. The values were seemingly random numbers. Something like the following.

Performance counter stats for 'ls':

       3.427434  task-clock-msecs         #      0.046 CPUs 
              2  context-switches         #      0.001 M/sec
              0  CPU-migrations           #      0.000 M/sec
            218  page-faults              #      0.064 M/sec
 140737488355327  cycles                   # 41062056440.861 M/sec
 68825777242116  instructions             #      0.489 IPC  
 68825777242117  branches                 # 20080846849.893 M/sec
 68825777242118  branch-misses            #    100.000 %    
  <not counted>  cache-references        
  <not counted>  cache-misses     

The guest image is using 2.6.34-0.10.rc1.git0.fc14.it68 kernel and the host is Fedora-12 with a kernel built from 2.6.34-rc1-tip+ git tree running on Quad-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2350. Is there some combination of kernel/distribution/hardware that the hardware performance counters are suppose to work on?

-Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/