linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] Show data flow for file copyup in unions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2640.1268899857@jrobl>
Date:	Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:10:57 +0900
From:	"J. R. Okajima" <hooanon05@...oo.co.jp>
To:	Valerie Aurora <vaurora@...hat.com>
Cc:	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>,
	Dmitry Monakhov <dmonakhov@...nvz.org>,
	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Show data flow for file copyup in unions


Valerie Aurora:
> I think what people will expect is that we copy up in that case.  I
> can think of ways this can go wrong, but perhaps that should be an
> explicit requirement on the top-layer file system, that it can handle
> create/unlink() in a directory without write permission.

I am not sure such requirement is the right way.
How about delegating open() to keventd or some other workqueue which
will succeed to create files under a directory without write permission?
Of course, we should handle some error cases after creating a file.


J. R. Okajima
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/