[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BA32645.3020500@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:22:45 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>, drepper@...il.com,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single
project
On 03/19/2010 12:16 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
>> Yes its a double standard
>>
>> Glibc has a higher standard than Fedora/RHEL.
>>
>> Just like the Ubuntu kernel ships various ugly unfit for upstream kernel
>> drivers.
>>
> There's a world of a difference between a fugly driver and a glibc patch.
>
>
Yes, fugly drivers can be cleaned up, but glibc ABIs are forever.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists