linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [PATCH 2.6.23..2.6.24] Backport r and q constraints fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <43e72e891003181734g1356d1b6t6fccf2c1ea8afded@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 18 Mar 2010 17:34:18 -0700
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <lrodriguez@...eros.com>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
	stephen.chen@...eros.com, cliff.holden@...eros.com, hpa@...or.com,
	mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 2.6.23..2.6.24] Backport r and q constraints 
	fixes

On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 01:40:04PM -0500, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> Upstream commit: 811a0fff5d6e80e18e06be88e0fb685f3924bf8f
>>
>> This patch included on 2.6.25 is required to be backported to compile
>> both the 2.6.23 and 2.6.24 kernels on x86_64 systems with a modern
>> toolchain. Otherwise you get this pesky assembly error:
>
> You do realize that the .23 and .24 kernels are no longer supported,
> right?

Heh yes, but figured the google cache will still support those users.

  Luis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/