[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BA36D49.7080703@bfs.de>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:25:45 +0100
From: walter harms <wharms@....de>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] acpi_pad: "processor_aggregator" name too long
Dan Carpenter schrieb:
> cpi_device_class can only be 19 characters and a NULL terminator.
>
> With the current name we get a buffer overflow in acpi_pad_add()
> strcpy(acpi_device_class(device), ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS);
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> ---
> Feel free to pick your own name if you don't like mine. :)
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> index 7e52295..2db89d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
> #include <acpi/acpi_bus.h>
> #include <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
>
> -#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS "processor_aggregator"
> +#define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_CLASS "proc_aggregator"
> #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_DEVICE_NAME "Processor Aggregator"
> #define ACPI_PROCESSOR_AGGREGATOR_NOTIFY 0x80
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(isolated_cpus_lock);
Hi Dan,
IMHO this does not solve the core problem. acpi should use kstrncpy or better a pointer.
The next guy that use "my_great_indentifier_is_longer_than_yours" will cause the same
problem.
But this is something that the acpi group needs to answer (fast).
re,
wh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists